
Mask-Wearing Represents Fear and Blind Obedience, Not
Science
Dennis Prager, Commentary
When I see people walking outside, often alone
with no one anywhere near them, wearing a mask, my primary reactions are
disappointment and sadness.
I am disappointed because I expected better from
my fellow Americans. I never thought most Americans would be governed by
irrational fears and unquestioning obedience to authority. I have come to
realize that I had a somewhat romanticized view of my countrymen.
Had you told me a year ago that nearly every
American in nearly every metropolitan area would cover their faces for over a
year because one man, one political party and the media told them to, I would
have responded that you underestimate the strength of the American character.
But here we are, over a year later, and where I
live (the Los Angeles area), I am usually the only person on the street not
wearing a mask. (For the record, I wear a mask in stores and when entering the
building in which I work, out of courtesy to those who think a person not
wearing a mask poses a lethal threat.)
On the rare occasions I pass people not wearing
a mask, I thank and praise them. They are invariably enthused by my reaction.
You do not need medical or scientific expertise
to understand the foolishness of outdoor mask-wearing. Common sense, that great
unused guide to life, suffices.
If you wear a mask, you do so in the belief that
you are protecting yourself (and others) from COVID-19. So, then, why do
you care if I do not wear a mask? Doesn’t your mask protect you? If it does, my
not wearing a mask may irritate you because you resent my assertion of freedom,
my obvious lack of respect for government and medical authorities, and my alleged
selfishness, but there would be no rational medical—that is,
“science-based”—reason for your objecting to my not wearing a mask.
And if masks protect us and others, why have
people been refused the right to visit a loved one as he or she lay dying alone?
Why couldn’t a person—wearing the same mask a doctor, nurse, or any health care
worker wears when entering your parent’s room—enter that room? There are two
possible answers: One is it’s a tacit admission that masks are essentially
useless. You were prevented from visiting your dying father because the
hospital believes your loved one or others in the hospital might contract the
virus from you, even though you were wearing a mask. Which means those running
the hospital don’t believe masks actually work. The other is that the medical
establishment and lay authorities have abandoned elementary human decency in
the name of AOC, or “Abundance of Caution.” Forcing hundreds of thousands of
people to die alone will go down as one of the cruelest policies ever adopted
by American medical and political authorities.
The problem is most Americans who
went to college learned to unquestioningly obey “experts.” This is why common
sense, logic, and reason mean little to the well-educated—and, increasingly, to
everyone else, because everyone is taught by the well-educated. All we need to
know is what the “experts” say. That plus a fanatical adherence to the rule of
AOC have crushed logic and reason.
The irony, however, is that “the science” does
not justify the fanatical commitment to mask-wearing. There are plenty of
experts with evidence-based views to the contrary. Here are but a few examples:
Dr. Anthony Fauci himself told
the truth about the uselessness of mask-wearing on “60 Minutes” on March 8,
2020:
“Right now, in the United States,
people should not be walking around with masks. … There is no reason to be
walking around with a mask. When you are in the middle of an outbreak, wearing
a mask might make people feel a little bit better, and it might even block a
droplet, but it is not providing the perfect protection that people think that
it is. And, often, there are unintended consequences: People keep fiddling with
the mask, and they keep touching their face.”
Dr. Ramin Oskoui, a cardiologist
in Washington at a Senate hearing in December 2020, testified under oath:
“Masks do not work.” (The New
York Times, Dec. 8, 2020.)
The Wall Street Journal reported
on Nov. 11, 2020:
“The projected number of lives
saved, and the implied case for a mask mandate, are based on a faulty statistic.”
Dr. Paul E. Alexander, a Canadian
epidemiologist, wrote:
“Surgical and cloth masks, used
as they currently are, have absolutely no impact on controlling the
transmission of Covid-19 virus, and current evidence implies that face-masks can be actually harmful.” (American Institute
for Economic Research, Feb. 11, 2021.)
Roger W. Koops, who has a
doctorate in chemistry from the University of California, Riverside, wrote:
“A ‘mask,’ and that term usually
refers to either a SURGICAL mask or N95 mask, has no benefit in the general
population and is only useful in controlled clinical settings. Further, it has
been considered a greater transmission risk than a benefit in the general population.
… In the open environment, no one should be wearing face coverings.” (American
Institute for Economic Research, Oct. 16, 2020.)
Finally, a study published in the
New England Journal of Medicine on May 21, 2020, concluded:
“We know that wearing a mask
outside health care facilities offers little, if any, protection from
infection. Public health authorities define a significant exposure to Covid-19
as face-to-face contact within 6 feet with a patient with symptomatic Covid-19
that is sustained for at least a few minutes (and some say more than 10 minutes
or even 30 minutes). The chance of catching Covid-19 from a passing interaction
in a public space is therefore minimal. In many cases, the desire for
widespread masking is a reflexive reaction to anxiety over the pandemic.”
Contrary to mainstream media misinformation, the
doctors who wrote that report did not later retract anything they wrote.
People say they “follow the science.” They
rarely do. They follow the scientists the media tell them to follow.
Dennis Prager is a nationally
syndicated radio talk-show host and columnist.
No comments:
Post a Comment